Ytring
What drives my candidacy: These Patterns Must Change
From 18 to 20 March, we temporary employees get to vote for our representative on the NTNU Board. This is an opportunity for us to influence the direction in which NTNU is heading.
Eskil Gaasø Indrestrand
Foto: Privat
Dette er en ytring. Innholdet i teksten uttrykker forfatterens mening.
I am running because
our work environment matters every single day.
Findings from NIFU’s
national Forskerhverdag survey from 2025 show that a large majority of
temporary staff report being happy at work. That is encouraging. But the same
data also reveal paradoxes that we at NTNU should take seriously.
Enig eller uenig?
Send oss din ytring på
Many of us work long
hours, shift between teaching, research, conferences, and administration, and
keep projects moving under tight deadlines. This creates stress and
uncertainty. That in itself is not unusual in academia or similar professions.
What concerns me is that early career researchers are once again the outliers
in statistics measuring work environment and well-being.
More than two in
three PhD candidates, and a similar share of postdocs, report that feelings
such as restlessness or nervousness are job related, far above both the
national and academic averages. Many of us also report job related sleep
problems, which may reflect dedication and grit, but also show that our
workload follows us throughout the day.
Workload alone is
not the only explanation. Culture matters too. Even though temporary employees
have supervisors from day one, we still report lower access to help from
colleagues compared with other groups in academia. And it is undeniable that
the temporary nature of our positions is a factor that affects our work.
Entering academia is
and should be a challenge to overcome. Good research demands hard work and,
yes, a few sleepless nights. But it is crucial that NTNU provides conditions in
which temporary employees can thrive, develop, and contribute. Our work environment
fundamentally shapes our ability to grow as researchers. What I cannot accept
is that we continue to treat these patterns as inescapable for early‑career
researchers.
If this resonates
with you and your colleagues, I am your candidate!